Can you say Big Brother?

A story on cnn.com is reporting on a boy who got spied on in his home by his school. I understand the need for security of rented out laptops, even to the point of taking over the machine if stolen or lost. However, the facts in this case clearly show this machine was not lost or stolen and that the Assistant Principle accessed the machine and took a picture of the boy, in his own bedroom, using the laptops webcam. The constitutional violator obviously didn't think he'd done anything wrong because he presented the boy with a letter and a picture stating he'd been caught in "inappropriate behavior". No, this is completely and utterly wrong. We are guaranteed by the Constitution that nobody can enter our home whether electronically or physically without a warrant. In fact, this assistant principle is probably guilty of a crime of some sort. Not only should this family win their lawsuit, but there is at least one employee who should lose their job and perhaps even be prosecuted.